ANNOUNCEMENT: United We Dream gathers in Minneapolis

This weekend, 46 DREAM Act student leaders from 15 states and Washington, DC are traveling to Minnesota to reflect on ten years of DREAM Act activism and look forward to the next ten years of fighting for immigrant rights.

Read the full story »
Videos

short clips, psa, ad spots.

Publications

studies and reports

Opinion Piece

editorials, thoughts and regurgitation

Merchandise

support the dream act movement. buy dream act products.

Events

coverage of dream act events – rallies, workshops, panels, conferences.

Home » News Article

The PROUD Act

It came to our attention last week that Representative Joe Baca was re-introducing a bill for immigrant high-school graduates called the PROUD Act or ‘People Resolved to Obtain an Understanding of Democracy Act’ (H.R. 2681).

We would like to thank Joe Baca for introducing this bill again as his efforts do demonstrate the support that exists for immigrant youth.

When we called his office to ask for clarification and to see how the PROUD Act related to the DREAM Act and how we could work together, Baca’s staff were unclear – “No, he has not co-sponsored Dream, no they don’t have background info on why he introduced bill…”

After studying the 1-page bill, we have to conclude that the PROUD Act is not a viable alternative to the DREAM Act. We welcome a bill that does not have a military provision, benefits young people, and pushes the DREAM Act further to the Left.  But what we have here is a more restrictive measure that alienates more students than the DREAM Act and doesn’t provide the necessary protections needed.

First, the age requirements are too restrictive and arbitrary. The PROUD Act would not benefit the scores of talented and hard-working students that have been working on getting legislation benefiting immigrant youth passed for so many years.

Essentially, the bill would only benefit those ‘alien minors’ who have been here from Grade 6 to 12, completed high school with a civics curriculum, and are under the age of 25 when they file their application.

Goodbye Matias.

Goodbye Tam Tran.

Goodbye Marie Gonzalez.

Goodbye Prerna.

Josh Bernstein, Director of Immigration at SEIU, states that “fewer students would qualify under the PROUD Act because they would have to have come here at a much younger age and even if they have been here since infancy they would not qualify if through no fault of their own they reach 25 years old before the law is enacted and regulations published.”

In comparison, the House DREAM Act bill has no age limit with the cut-off requirement for entry at around 10th-11th grade instead of 6th. A 15-year old is also a minor who is not culpable for the alleged transgressions of their parents.

Rigid age requirements aside, there are no provision for persons who get a GED instead of a high school diploma. If you dropped out of high school, you won’t be able to get a GED. Goodbye.

Additionally, unlike the DREAM Act, there is no protection against deportation for high school or junior high school students before graduation, no confidentiality provision to protect parents, no expedited processing and no repeal of federal in-state tuition restrictions.

And given that it was only re-introduced in the House with one co-sponsor, there is little-to-no chance of passage.

The DREAM Act is the result of 9 years of hard-work, compromise and battle. And it is closer to passage than ever before. Lets hope immigrant youth don’t have to wait another decade for immigration reform.

Call (202)225-6161, email and thank Joe Baca for introducing the PROUD Act and ask him to cosponsor and support the DREAM Act today.

While you are at it, here are more actions you can undertake in support of the DREAM Act.

Popularity: 40% [?]

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

5 Comments »

  • Janeth says:

    This is bill is too restrictive and would not help many immigrants. Instead supporters of this bill should think about supporting the Dream act which carries all qualified under the proud act…

  • Sancha dominez says:

    The Dream Act is already too restrictive. The PROUD ACT will exclude students from the education system even more. I don't think education for human beings should be a matter of debate anywhere in the world. It's ridiculous that thousands of students have been trying to fix and fix the argument of why students should have the opportunity to go to school. Sometimes I just don't understand it. I do understand it when I realize that for hundreds of years politians in the United States have discriminated against people of different races in order to maintain power.

    • Thania Jimenez says:

      I completely agree with you because education should not be a privileged it should be a right to every human being and until that happens all around the world then it I'll be a "BETTER" world but until then we will keep fighting for our right to equal opportunities..

  • sancha Dominguez says:

    I forgot one very important thing no one is talking about the real issue everyone is tyring to convince politians. When will have individuals who are not scare to call the issue for what it is and stop kissing ass in D.C.

  • Prerna says:

    I am hoping that the PROUD Act is a way that anti-military dissenters of the DREAM Act and legal immigrant kids can stop attacking the shortcomings of the DREAM Act and advocate for their own bill. It would make the most sense moving forward.

Leave a comment!

You must be logged in to post a comment.