Is Nancy Pelosi trying to improve her ratings with hate groups like FAIR and NumbersUSA?

Check out an excerpt from her interview on the Charles Rose Show just this past week (Oct 16):

NANCY PELOSI: Immigration, we have to have comprehensive immigration reform. We`ve always talked about our principles: secure our borders, enforce our laws, have — Family unification has been part of our immigration law. Have that as a principle. Try to have path to legalization. I still don`t know where Senator McCain is on it. He has been back and forth. He was the author of the legislation and then he opposed it and the rest. But perhaps what we have to do is reverse it and require that everyone in our country become legal. And then say to them, if you can`t meet the test, you have to go home. Or you have — you just have –

CHARLIE ROSE: Require them to go through the process of becoming legal.

NANCYPELOSI: I`m just saying becoming citizens. I`m just saying register so that we know who you are.

CHARLIE ROSE: If you`re not willing to register and be identified, then you`ve got to go back.

NANCY PELOSI: You got to go back. We have to do something.

What was that? Surely, Nancy Pelosi is in a position to realize that undocumented migrants are not undocumented out of choice–we CANNOT become legal no matter how much we want to. Hello? What part of legal immigration don’t you understand? Those of us brought here by our parents illegally CANNOT become legal without legislation such as the DREAM Act or Comprehensive Immigration Reform.

Additionally, requiring us to go home means a 10-year ban and separation from our families–what sort of family unification plan is that?

What democratic principles is Nancy Pelosi upholding by agreeing to politically disenfranchise 12 million immigrants forever?

This isn’t a one-time statement. She continues on this new mantra reported in the AP:

The estimated 12 million immigrants in the U.S. illegally “are part of the U.S. economy. We cannot send them all home, and we cannot send them all to jail, so we have to address it,” Pelosi said.

Any solution would have to be bipartisan, she said, so it may require sacrificing some of Democrats’ past priorities, such as giving illegal immigrants a path to citizenship.

“Maybe there never is a path to citizenship if you came here illegally,” Pelosi said.

“I would hope that there could be, but maybe there isn’t.”

Ms. Pelosi, a lot of Dreamers didn’t COME here illegally; they were BROUGHT here illegally.

Is this one of the ‘changes’ we are supposed to be expecting under the Obama Administration? I surely hope not.

Further research reveals that Nancy Pelosi is one of the Democrats to received a handsome donation just this past June from CCA–Corrections Corpoation of America, the company that hit the jacket by jailing immigrants for profit. Do you see the Iron Triangle?

Lets say Pelosi has not sold her conscience to the dev…Err, foes of immigration reform. Is Nancy Pelosi trying to pander to the almost non-existent conservative voters in her district given that the more liberal anti-war activist Cindy Sheehan threatens to end Pelosi’s reign in the House of Representatives? Doubtful.

I only hope that Sheehan is successful in unseating Pelosi from her years of double-speak, pandering, selling out and lying to her constituents and the rest of America.

• Pelosi Backs Away from Cornerstone of Comprehensive Reform – Migra Matters
• Pelosi Backtracks on Comprehensive Immigration Reform – Citizen Orange
• Pelosi Puts a Wall Up on Path to Citizenship – Change.org
• Nancy Pelosi Proves that Dems Aren’t Immigrant Friendly Either – VivirLatino
• Pelosi Suggests Permanent U.S. Slave Class – The Unapologetic Mexican

Popularity: 3% [?]