Why the DREAM Act Failed to Pass
January 20, 2011 in News Article by luisb
Hello! This past Monday—Martin Luther King Jr.’s Day—gave me an opportunity to reflect on what happened with Civil Rights Movement in the 1950’s and 60’s. Analyzing what happened back then and what’s going on today with the DREAM Act movement (and other contemporary civil rights movements) I can safely say that they were movements that share numerous similarities. Moreover, Martin Luther King recognized a major block in the integration of African Americans to white society.
Martin Luther King’s Letter from Birmingham Jail (1963), a letter in response to the Statement by Alabama Clergymen is a prime example of a major obstacle that civil rights activist faced in the 1960’s but continue to face today. In that letter Martin Luther King stated,
First, I must confess that over the past few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro’s great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen’s Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to ‘order’ than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice.
Reading this made me realize that people who tend to call themselves “moderates,” even in contemporary times have failed to support causes that will integrate disenfranchised populations. Nearly sixty years have passed since the great Martin Luther King Jr. pointed this out.
Martin Luther King Jr. added that “Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will.” What he’s trying to say is that the people who claim to be opened to “any” possibilities—those in the middle—fail to acknowledge the importance of certain issues and policies that should be promulgated.
Much has been said about what caused the DREAM Act to fail: was it politics? (Republicans did not want Obama to win); was it an economic issue? (Supply and demand of students and workers); were politicians acting in a manner that would guarantee them reelection? Or was it nativism and racism? However, most people have failed to see a major factor that resulted in the defeat of the federal DREAM Act, and that is—the moderate vote or as King stated “the white moderate.”
For instance, five Democratic senators voted against the DREAM Act: Baucus (MT), Hagan (NC), Nelson (NE), Pryor (AR), and Tester (MT). These senators are supposed to be progressive in ideology but they are representatives of conservative states hence they vote in a moderate fashion. In addition, there were six Republican “moderate” senators that voted no on the DREAM Act. Several of them had voted yes on past DREAM Act legislation. Moderate Republican senators voting no on the DREAM Act were: Collins (ME), Hutchison (TX), Kirk (IL), Lemieux (FL), Snowe (ME), and Voinovich (OH).
In short, this is an powerful example of how the “moderate” politician, organizer or citizen can fail to see the real issue at hand while defeating what Martin Luther King called a “just law”—a moral law.
What can we learn from this? We must realize that we cannot change the anti-immigrant philosophy (the extreme right), there’s no need to convince those that are already convinced (Dream Activists), but it is essential to inform, convince, and educate the “moderate population,” which might, in principle, support our cause but do not act in accordance to those beliefs—they’re passive. Every single one of us can do something to make this happen.
I wanted to commend Martin Luther King Jr. for his passionate efforts in favor of civil rights. As we can see here Martin Luther King Jr.’s teachings remain relevant.
“One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws” (Martin Luther King Jr.).

















